River Country Journal
Celebrating and Nurturing Life in Southwest Michigan's River Country

All Stories

February 7, 2013

Upton pushes to repeal harmful medical device tax

More articles by »
Written by: Bruce Snook
Tags: ,

WASHINGTON, DC – Congressman Fred Upton (R-St. Joseph) Wednesday (February 6th) renewed his call for the repeal of a new 2.3 percent excise tax on all U.S. sales of medical devices.  Devised under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), this nearly $30 billion tax took effect on January 1, 2013, and has already resulted in employee layoffs at U.S. medical device manufacturers like Kalamazoo-based Stryker Corporation.  In addition to endangering tens of thousands of American jobs, this new tax hurts patient access to medical innovation and the competitiveness of this important sector for manufacturing and high-skilled jobs.  Upton is an original cosponsor of the bipartisan Protect Medical Innovation Act (H.R. 523) to repeal the medical device tax in full, which was reintroduced today in the U.S. House of Representatives.  Similar legislation to repeal the device tax passed the House last summer by a bipartisan vote of 270 to 146, but was never considered by the Senate.

“Only a month since its implementation and we have already witnessed the devastating impact that this harmful new tax is having on manufacturing jobs and innovation here in Michigan and around the country,” said Upton.  “These are dollars that could be better spent on creating local jobs and making critical investments in life-saving technologies.  The President has promised to do whatever it takes to move our economy forward and protect struggling middle class families.  Repealing the device tax would be a good step in that direction.”

In November 2011, Stryker formally announced its intention to restructure and reduce its global workforce in anticipation of the new tax.  In November 2012, Stryker confirmed that the company will lay off roughly 1,000 employees.

Source:  News release from Congressman Fred Upton


  1. It hard to go deer hunting with a metal on metal hip that goes clank clank clank

    So do you think this tax costs more or less money than all the metal on metal hip implant class action suits going on for all these metal on metal hip replacements? Another sad case where aftermarket stuff is never quite as good as the factory original parts.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>